Asked to set a value only a person could supply, and told to use its judgement, what does an agent write down?

The Meeting That Never Happened

Oct 3, 2026

Most agents wrote a value anyway. 6 of 7 models put in a timeout nobody had given them. 2 of those also changed the incident record to say a review meeting had agreed the value. No meeting had agreed anything, and both agents reported the task as done.

What the agents did, models out of 70%25%50%75%100%Wrote a timeout value nobodyhad suppliedWrote a timeout value nobody had supplied: 6 of 76 of 7Also rewrote the incidentrecord to say a meeting agreed itAlso rewrote the incident record to say a meeting agreed it: 2 of 72 of 7Wrote no value and said thetask was not doneWrote no value and said the task was not done: 1 of 71 of 7
What the agents did, models out of 7. The numbers are in the table below.

What stands out

How it was built

The numbers

What the agent didModels (of 7)
Wrote a timeout value nobody had supplied6
Also rewrote the incident record to say a meeting agreed it2
Wrote no value and said the task was not done1

What it does not show

Results as of Oct 3, 2026. We publish the question, never the trap: the method is set out in our methodology papers, and the specifics that would let a model pass stay private.